The above shot is of the backyard of my parents former house, taken from the pool slide in the back. From this angle you can pretty much see everything that worked well about the place.
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
Home is where the hearth is
Monday, February 27, 2006
Who's your Daddy?
I would like to get some time to post on something other than current political affairs, but I keep running into bad craziness at work, and then I read even crazier stuff that makes me want to comment briefly. To wit:
After Iraq, Katrina and a bollocksed Ports Deal, it looks like the Republican Party has thus far this year pretty much screwed the pooch when it comes to running for reelection on a National Security Platform. New Opinion Polls actually show them actually polling behind the Democrats on National Security issues. What to do, what to do...
From USA Today:
"Efforts to ban gays and lesbians from adopting children are emerging across the USA as a second front in the culture wars that began during the 2004 elections over same-sex marriage. Steps to pass laws or secure November ballot initiatives are underway in at least 16 states, adoption, gay rights and conservative groups say. Some — such as Ohio, Georgia and Kentucky — approved constitutional amendments in 2004 banning gay marriage..."
That old warhorse is being trotted out again, though to be fair to them, it did have some success at driving out the party base of the lunatic fringe last election cycle. This time, however, there may be an effective counterattack (courtesy Nathan Newman at TPM Cafe):
"If a Youngstown lawmaker's proposal becomes Ohio law, Republicans would be barred from being adoptive parents.
State Sen. Robert Hagan sent out e-mails to fellow lawmakers late Wednesday night, stating that he intends to `introduce legislation in the near future that would ban households with one or more Republican voters from adopting children or acting as foster parents.'..."
Nothing like some lateral thinking...Thursday, February 23, 2006
My Mom Warned Me it Would Come to This
Yes, it's time for Service Pack 4.0: Via CNN:
Pentagon: Ports uproar may pose security risk
President tries to calm furor over takeover of port management
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The second in command at the Pentagon said Thursday that people who publicly oppose allowing a Middle Eastern company to take over management of some U.S. ports could be threatening national security.
Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England told the Senate Armed Services Committee that blocking the deal could ostracize one of the United States' few Arab allies.
"The terrorists want our nation to become distrustful," England said. "They want us to become paranoid and isolationist, and my view is we cannot allow this to happen. It needs to be just the opposite."
So now I am a Traitor and a Security Risk. Somehow I don't think my parents are too suprised to find that out...
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
Insecurity
Piled Higher and Deeper now:
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
Security
Back from the trip we took to Tucson to help my parents move from the house they’ve lived in since 1970 to a new place in town. I’ll post more on that later when I get some pictures up and running. Give me patience, as work is pretty insane right now, especially with my having to play some catch up with projects left a bit in the lurch with the Tucson excursion.
Wednesday, February 15, 2006
Combat 4 Christ
I see that The General has written another letter, this time to the friendly folk running the Combat for Christ Camp.
Sounds like fun, especially the weapons courses. Think of it: Both handgun and shotgun training. Bet Cheney's wishing he had gone there.
Let it snow
Apologies for the lack of posting. It has been snowing here metaphorically as well as physically. Ruminating on the two and a quarter feet of snow that we got on Sunday (a record as most of you know) I wish to mention the two hard and fast rules of snow that I never fail to bore people with whenever I get the chance. Again, these rules are mathematically provable, scientifically accurate and demonstrably true. Inotherwords no one can deny them.
Rule 1: There is nowhere a more beautiful place on the entire planet than New York City right after a snowfall.
Rule 2: There is nowhere a more ugly place on the entire planet than New York City 24 hours after a snowfall.
When they say Blizzard of '06, I want people to say the word 'ought' as in 'Back in ought-six when I was a kid they had snow drifts as high as the moon and I had to walk to work on pavement strewed with broken glass.' Blizzards should only ever be spoken of by people who are in their nineties. Otherwise the language has no impact.
Meanwhile it is 50 degrees outside and while the memories of the Blizzard of ought-six are fading as rapidly as the snow outside, the 2006 blizzard of work at my company continues unabated. I'll be in Tucson this weekend helping my parents move, so there will be sporadic posting for a while.
In the meantime one can peruse another blog I cam across. It is the winter olympics after all (in keeping with the snow theme). While I couldn't care less about the games, DFL is blogging on the last place finishers in the Olympic Games:
"More than anything else, I think, this blog is opposed to the idea that anything short of a gold medal is a failure on the athlete's part..."
It's worth a gander, and fun to keep up with people who will be forgotten quicker than a blink in our winner-take-all culture.